Demographic analysis of hearing impairment based on various parameters in patients with cochlear implant.

Objectives: To analyse the demographic and clinical variables in children having undergone cochlear implant surgery because of deafness. METHODS: The cross-sectional study was conducted from January to November 2022 at the Centre for Research in Experimental and Applied Medicine laboratory of the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Army Medical College, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, in collaboration with the Ear, Nose and Throat Department of Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, and comprised children of eith gender aged up to 10 years who had received cochlear implant. Data was collected through questionnaire-based detailed interviews. Syndromic Hearing Loss, Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss, and Acquired Hearing Loss were identified among the subjects. Data was analysed using SPSS 22. RESULTS: Of the 250 cases, 147(58.8%) were boys, 146(58.4%) were aged 0-5 years, 219(87.6%) had prelingual onset of disease, and 202(80.8%) had a non-progressive disease course. In 203(81.2%) cases, normal developmental milestones were seen. Parental consanguinity was observed in 219(87.6%) cases. However, 63(25.2%) patients had a first-degree relative who had a history of deafness. In 170(68%) cases, hearing loss was hereditary, whereas in 80(32%) it was acquired. Meningitis was the most commonly identified risk factor 55(68.75%). Acquired risk factors and family history had significant association with hearing loss (p<0.05). Speech perception significantly improved in all 219(100%) patients with prelingual hearing loss who underwent cochlear implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Majority of the cases were found to be male, had a prelingual disease onset and a non-progressive disease course. Family history was a significant factor, while meningitis was the most common acquired cause of hearing loss.

An overview of risk factors, management and prevention of cochlear implant infections.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: With cochlear implantation becoming increasingly performed worldwide, an understanding of the risk factors, preventive measures, and management of cochlear implant (CI) infection remains important given the significant morbidity and cost it conveys. RECENT FINDINGS: At the turn of the 21st century there was a decrease in rates of CI infection, particularly meningitis, following the discontinuation of positioner use for CI. However, in more recent years rates of CI infection have remained largely static. Recently, studies evaluating preventive measures such as pneumococcal vaccination, S. aureus decolonization and surgical antibiotic prophylaxis have emerged in the literature. SUMMARY: Prompt recognition of CI infection and appropriate investigation and management are key, however at present treatment is largely informed by cohort and case-control studies and expert opinion. Preventive measures including pneumococcal vaccination, S. aureus decolonization and preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis play a role in reducing rates of CI infection. However, there remains a need for well designed clinical trials to provide higher level evidence to better guide preventive measures for, and management decisions of, CI infections in the future.

Day-case otology: Special attention to the pediatric cochlear implantation procedure.

OBJECTIVE: Assess the feasibility of cochlear implantation as day-surgery in children and identify variables influencing admission, readmission, and unplanned postoperative consultation. METHODS: This retrospective observational monocentric study was conducted according to the STROBE recommendations. Between January 2017 and July 2022, all medical records of children who underwent cochlear implantation were analyzed. Eligible children were admitted for the first time to the pediatric day-surgery unit. Exclusion criteria were children planned for inpatient procedure, bilateralization or explantation-reimplantation. Sex assigned at birth, analgesic medication, anesthesia and complications were related to categorical variables. Age, duration of anesthesia, length of stay and ASA score were related to continuous variables. RESULTS: We included 66 children from a total of 106. Mean age was 53 months [SD: 46 months, range 8-184 months]. Successful day-surgery management was observed in 86% of cases. In 14% of cases, children were admitted to the pediatric ENT unit for the following reasons: late awakening in 6%, non-controlled pain in 4.5%, postoperative nausea and vomiting in 3.5% of cases. Univariate analysis did not observe any factor promoting success of day-surgery regarding anesthetic agents. Age was not statistically significant as a factor of ambulatory failure. Time spent in the operating room was not a determining factor (p = 0.559). None of the children were rehospitalized. Early unplanned consultations were observed in 3% of cases for vertex edema in 1 case and uncomplicated otorrhea in 1 case. CONCLUSION: This study adds to the knowledge on pediatric cochlear implantation and suggests that this procedure is suitable for day-surgery at any age.

Troubleshooting Cochlear Implant Malfunction Using Neural Response Telemetry and Normal Saline.

Cochlear implantation has become a standard of care for a child diagnosed with bilateral profound sensorineural hearing loss with a structured surgical standard operating procedure. A 3-year-old boy with bilateral profound prelingual sensorineural deafness underwent a Med-EL Sonata Ti100 implant. We faced a peculiar situation intraoperatively after inserting the electrodes and closing the wound. The impedance recording indicated high ground path impedance with short-circuiting of few electrodes. As a bionic implant, its electronic components may at times malfunction both intraoperatively and/or postoperatively; therefore, neural response telemetry (NRT) was invented to check it. By using NRT and a few milliliters of normal saline, we were able to diagnose as well as rectify the malfunctioning of the implant.

Intracochlear Trauma and Local Ossification Patterns Differ Between Straight and Precurved Cochlear Implant Electrodes.

HYPOTHESIS: Trauma to the osseous spiral lamina (OSL) or spiral ligament (SL) during cochlear implant (CI) insertion segregates with electrode type and induces localized intracochlear ossification and fibrosis. BACKGROUND: The goal of atraumatic CI insertion is to preserve intracochlear structures, limit reactive intracochlear tissue formation, and preserve residual hearing. Previous qualitative studies hypothesized a localized effect of trauma on intracochlear tissue formation; however, quantitative studies failed to confirm this. METHODS: Insertional trauma beyond the immediate insertion site was histologically assessed in 21 human temporal bones with a CI. Three-dimensional reconstructions were generated and virtually resectioned perpendicular to the cochlear spiral at high resolution. The cochlear volume occupied by ossification or fibrosis was determined at the midpoint of the trauma and compared with regions proximal and distal to this point. RESULTS: Seven cases, all implanted with precurved electrodes, showed an OSL fracture beyond the immediate insertion site. Significantly more intracochlear ossification was observed at the midpoint of the OSL fracture, compared with the -26 to -18 degrees proximal and 28 to 56 degrees distal to the center. No such pattern was observed for fibrosis. In the 12 cases with a perforation of the SL (9 straight and 3 precurved electrodes), no localized pattern of ossification or fibrosis was observed around these perforations. CONCLUSION: OSL fractures were observed exclusively with precurved electrodes in this study and may serve as a nidus for localized intracochlear ossification. Perforation of the SL, in contrast, predominantly occurred with straight electrodes and was not associated with localized ossification.

Quality of life, hearing results, patient satisfaction and postoperative complications of day-case versus inpatient unilateral cochlear implantation in adults: a randomized controlled, equivalence trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the hypothesis that day-case cochlear implantation is associated with equal quality of life, hearing benefits and complications rates, compared to inpatient cochlear implantation. STUDY DESIGN: A single-center, non-blinded, randomized controlled, equivalence trial in a tertiary referral center. METHODS: Thirty adult patients with post-lingual bilateral sensorineural hearing loss eligible for unilateral cochlear implantation surgery were randomly assigned to either the day-case or inpatient treatment group. The effect on general quality of life, patient satisfaction, (subjective) hearing improvement, postoperative complications and causes of crossover and/or readmission were assessed using questionnaires, auditory evaluations and patients' charts over a follow-up period of 1 year. RESULTS: Overall quality of life measured by the HUI3 was equal between the day-case (n = 14) and inpatient group (n = 14). The overall patients' satisfaction showed a slight favor towards an inpatient approach. There was no significant difference in the subjective and objective hearing improvement between both treatment groups. During the 1-year follow-up period no major complications occurred. Minor complications occurred intraoperatively in three day-case patients resulting in three out of nine admissions of day-case patients. Other causes of admission of day-case patients were nausea and vomiting (n = 1), drowsiness (n = 1), late scheduled surgery (n = 2), social reasons (n = 1), or due to an unclear reason (n = 1). No patients required readmission. CONCLUSION: We found equal outcomes of QoL, patient satisfaction, objective, and subjective hearing outcomes between day-case and inpatient unilateral cochlear implantation. Nine out of 14 day-case patients were admitted for at least one night postoperatively (crossover). No major complications occurred in both groups. A day-case approach seems feasible when using specific patient selection, surgical planning and the preoperative provision of patient information into account. Besides this, the familiarity with a day-case approach of both patient and the surgical team can increase the feasibility of day-case surgery.

Co-Occurrence of Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Congenital Heart Disease: Etiologies and Management.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The co-occurrence of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and congenital heart disease (CHD) is a rare condition with complex etiologies. The purpose of this study is to assess the etiologies, clinical features, and outcomes of cochlear implant (CI) in this patient population. STUDY DESIGN: Case series and literature review. METHODS: Clinical data of children who were diagnosed with SNHL and CHD and received CIs at a tertiary hospital from 2016 to 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. A literature review was performed to identify patients with SNHL and CHD. FINDINGS: Of the 382 children who underwent cochlear implantation at our center, eight (2.1%) were diagnosed with SNHL and CHD. A literature review identified 1525 patients from 254 studies; the database therefore consisted of 1533 patients. The most common genetic etiologies of co-occurring SNHL and CHD were CHARGE syndrome (36.3%), Turner syndrome (8.4%), 22q11.2 deletion (3.0%), Noonan syndrome (2.9%), and Down syndrome (2.5%), whereas the most common non-genetic etiologies were congenital rubella syndrome (22.9%) and SNHL after early cardiac surgery (5.5%). Most of the patients presented with congenital, bilateral, severe-profound SNHL requiring early rehabilitation. Of the 126 children who received CIs at a median age of 2.5 years, half showed delayed speech development at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Co-occurring SNHL and CHD is a rare condition with complex etiologies. Timely hearing intervention with long-term follow-up and proper timing of heart surgery is essential for these children. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4, case series Laryngoscope, 134:400-409, 2024.

Insertion of a second electrode array-a rare complication of CI reimplantation.

Due to a technical defect or a medical indication, it may be necessary to explant a cochlear implant. This case report shows that there is the risk of encountering a nonremovable electrode array-as described here from the scala tympani-during cochlear reimplantation. In the present case, insertion of a second electrode array into the free and nonobstructed scala vestibuli was successful. Nonetheless, the indication for reimplantation must be carefully considered, especially in patients with tolerable limitations with little or no loss of speech understanding. Furthermore, surgery should not be performed solely because an implant upgrade is desired.

Prospective study on magnetic resonance imaging in cochlear implant patients.

PURPOSE: Monocentric, prospective study to investigate whether concomitant support of cochlear implant (CI) patients by CI-trained otolaryngologists and application of a standardized head bandage can minimize potential complications during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with 46 CIs underwent MRI with a prophylactic head bandage. All participants and the otolaryngologist at the CI center completed pre- and post-MRI questionnaires documenting body region scanned, duration of MRI and bandage wear, field strength during the scan, and any complications. If pain was experienced, it was assessed using a visual analog scale (1-10). RESULTS: MRI was performed without adverse events in 37.8% of cases. Magnet dislocation requiring surgical revision occurred in 2% of cases. Pain was reported in 86% of cases, often due to the tightness of the dressing. Patients with rotating, MRI-compatible magnets reported significantly less pain than participants with older-generation implants. In 11% of cases, the MRI was discontinued. CONCLUSION: Serious complications during MRI in cochlear implant patients are rare. Pain is the most common adverse event, probably mainly due to the tight bandage required by most implant types. With newer generations of magnets, these patients experience less pain, no dislocation of the magnets, and no need for bandaging. Although magnet dislocation cannot be completely prevented in older generations of implants, it appears to be reduced by good patient management, which recommends examination under the guidance of physicians trained in the use of hearing implants.

The effect of ventilation tube insertion in pediatric cochlear implantation candidates with otitis media with effusion on postoperative complications.

OBJECTIVE: Otitis media with effusion (OME) is a common finding in pediatric cochlear implant(CI) candidates and may be managed by inserting ventilation tubes. This study aimed to compare postoperative complication rates in children who underwent CI without and with OME, including patients who were treated without and with ventilation tube insertion. METHODS: A population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted, including all CI patients, under ten years of age, at our institution, between 2007 and 2020. The study's population was divided into three groups based on their middle ear status at CI: 1) OME previously treated with VT, 2) untreated OME, and 3) normal-aerated ears. Postoperative complications of the groups were reviewed and served as our primary outcome measure. RESULTS: Of the 257 implanted ears included, 53, 42, and 162 ears belonged to the VT-treated OME, untreated OME, and aerated groups, respectively. Acute mastoiditis (AM) rate was significantly higher in the OME group compared to the aerated groups (9.5 % vs. 2.5 %, p = 0.0134) and in the VT-treated compared to the untreated OME groups (15.1 % vs. 2.3 %, p = 0.0356). Similarly, the rate of developing chronic suppurative otitis media without cholesteatoma (CSOMWC) was significantly higher in the OME compared to the aerated groups (12.6 % vs. 2.5 %, p = 0.0011) and in the VT-treated compared to the untreated OME groups (18.8 % vs. 4.7 %, p = 0.0366). Other complications rated were very low and similar between the groups. No other statistical difference was found between the groups. CONCLUSION: VT insertion in pediatric CI candidates with OME increased postoperative AM and CSOMWC. We believe that, at least in our population, VT introduction prior to CI, for OME, surgery should be avoided.

[Insertion of a second electrode array-a rare complication of CI reimplantation. German version]. / Insertion eines zweiten Elektrodenträgers ­ eine seltene Komplikation bei CI-Reimplantation.

Due to a technical defect or a medical indication, it may be necessary to explant a cochlear implant. This case report shows that there is the risk of encountering a nonremovable electrode array-as described here from the scala tympani-during cochlear reimplantation. In the present case, insertion of a second electrode array into the free and nonobstructed scala vestibuli was successful. Nonetheless, the indication for reimplantation must be carefully considered, especially in patients with tolerable limitations with little or no loss of speech understanding. Furthermore, surgery should not be performed solely because an implant upgrade is desired.

Mechanism underlying and prevention of electrode migration in cochlear implants.

PURPOSE: We investigate the clinical manifestations, mechanisms, and methods of preventing electrode migration in Cochlear Implantation (CI) patients, based on our practical experience with this problem. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective study in a single center. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed electrode migration in 4 (0.75%) of 532 patients who underwent CI at our tertiary institution from January 2002 to December 2022. Pre- and post-operative pure-tone audiometry, word recognition score, aided functional gain test, and sound field speech intelligibility test were evaluated. RESULTS: All four patients underwent CIs with the straight electrode type. The following events or symptoms were observed in the patients before confirming electrode migration: an increase in high-frequency thresholds during the post-operative aided functional gain test and a decline in scores on the sound field speech intelligibility test. Electrode migration was confirmed through transocular view X-ray or temporal bone computer tomography. Two patients showed coiled electrodes within the mastoid cavity; while in the others, the electrodes were observed to be floating inside the cavity. To prevent migration of electrodes due to these issues, we mixed bone paste collected during the drilling of the mastoid cavity with glue and used it to secure the electrodes in place. CONCLUSION: Electrode migration can result in a decrease in hearing ability and may necessitate a revision surgery to adjust the electrode placement. The main factors affecting electrode placement include the position of electrode within the mastoid cavity and the elasticity of straight electrodes. It is important for surgeons to recognize the factors that increase the risk of electrode migration and to take preventative measures to reduce this risk.

Acquired cholesteatoma after cochlear implants: case series and literature review.

PURPOSE: To assess the prevalence and management of acquired cholesteatoma after cochlear implantation in pediatric and adult patients. METHODS: Retrospective case review of pediatric and adult cochlear implants (CI) followed at a tertiary referral center and literature review of acquired cholesteatoma after CI surgery, to identify its prevalence, cause, and treatment. RESULTS: Nine pediatric CIs were diagnosed with cholesteatoma in seven patients after 6.4 ± 4 years from CI surgery, and two adults after 11.3 and 21.7 years from CI surgery. Thirty-four pediatric cases and 26 adult cases are described in the literature. Cholesteatoma has a prevalence of 0.54% in pediatric CIs, and 1.79% in adult CIs (case series and literature). Adult cases were diagnosed significantly later compared to pediatric cases (Mann-Whitney test, p = 0.0460). Three pediatric cholesteatomas were treated with conservative surgery and preservation of the CI; they all developed recurrent disease. The remaining pediatric cases underwent subtotal petrosectomy with simultaneous CI explantation and staged reimplantation. Only one case recurred. The adult cases underwent simultaneous subtotal petrosectomy, explantation, and reimplantation. Similarly, 33.3% of cases treated with conservative/reconstructive surgery in the literature required revision surgery or conversion to subtotal petrosectomy against 6.2% of subtotal petrosectomies in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: Cholesteatoma after CI is a rare and late-onset complication of CIs. It is more prevalent in the adult CI population, although it affects children significantly earlier. The treatment of choice is subtotal petrosectomy and CI explantation with simultaneous or staged reimplantation.

Magnetic Resonancy Imaging Safety in Active Osseointegrated (Osia®) and Cochlear Implants: New Technology Creating Confusion.

OBJECTIVE: There is increased confusion regarding MRI-compatible CIs and BAHAs. This report describes two cases when patients underwent MRIs with non-MRI compatible devices. RESULTS: One patient with bilateral Cochlear Osias experienced dislocation of both internal magnets after 1.5 Tesla MRI. Both magnets were outside the silastic sheath, with the left magnet flipped. A second patient with a legacy CI experienced similar internal magnet dislocation and inversion after 3 Tesla MRI. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes internal magnet dislocation/inversion with the Cochlear Osia and a legacy CI after MRI. Our findings suggest the need for improved patient education and simplified radiology guidelines. Laryngoscope, 134:393-396, 2024.

Risk of Monopolar Electrosurgery in Cochlear Implant Recipients is Nominal: Evidence to Guide Clinical Practice.

OBJECTIVE: Comprehensively assess the prevalence of monopolar electrosurgery-related device complications among cochlear implant (CI) recipients. STUDY DESIGN: Multifaceted retrospective review and survey. SETTING: Tertiary medical center. METHODS: Multifaceted approach including: (i) review of the current literature; (ii) historical review of institutional data from an academic, tertiary CI center; (iii) review of industry data provided by 3 Food and Drug Administration-approved CI manufacturers; and (iv) survey of high-volume CI centers. RESULTS: Literature review identified 9 human studies, detailing 84 devices with 199 episodes of device-cautery exposure. From studies reporting on patients records, no implant showed evidence of damage after exposure. One cadaveric study using dental cautery reported 1 episode of device damage. Review of institutional records did not identify any CI damage in 84 instances of exposure. Data from the 3 major implant manufacturers showed a single report of damage that could be reasonably linked to monopolar electrosurgery, out of a possible 689,426 CIs. Last, a survey of 8 high-volume CI centers did not identify any adverse events associated with monopolar cautery. CONCLUSION: These data estimate the risk of adverse device-related events or tissue injury to be extraordinarily low. Short of operating in immediate proximity to the CI (ie, the ipsilateral temporoparietal scalp), these data indicate that monopolar electrosurgery can be used in the body and the head-and-neck of CI recipients with nominal risk. These findings may guide decision-making in cases that are optimally or preferably performed with monopolar electrocautery and can be used to counsel CI patients following inadvertent exposures.

Cochlear Implantation in Children Under 9 Months of Age: Safety and Efficacy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety of cochlear implants (CIs) in children under 9 months of age to better understand expected postoperative complication rates, and to provide a preliminary look at efficacy. STUDY DESIGN: Single-center retrospective review. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Children 5 to 8 months of age who received a CI between 2011 and 2021. INTERVENTIONS: Therapeutic-CI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was 6-month postoperative complication rate. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, device explantation/reimplantation, rehabilitation supports, and hearing and language outcomes. Complications of children implanted under than 9 months of age was compared with a cohort of children implanted 9 to 18 months of age between the years 2011 and 2016 using a chi-squared test ( p < 0.05). RESULTS: One hundred six children under 9 months of age were implanted (204 CIs) at a mean age of 6.6 months (range: 5-8). Postoperative complications occurred in 28 patients (26%) and were often minor. There were no mortalities. There was no statistically significant difference in complications, including reimplantation rates, between patients implanted under 9 months of age and those implanted 9 to 18 months of age. Speech discrimination outcomes were excellent, and mean spoken language outcomes were near normative for typically developing children. CONCLUSIONS: Cochlear implantation can be a safe and effective treatment option for children 5 to 8 months of age. Early hearing screening and referral for infants to receive appropriate intervention will continue to play a critical role in optimizing speech and language outcomes.

Surgical and audiologic outcomes following revision cochlear implantation in children.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of cochlear implantation failure is rare; however, complications can arise in which revision surgery becomes necessary. The purpose of this study is to review our institutional experience with revision cochlear implantation to further understand the surgical and audiological outcomes after cochlear implant failure. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent revision cochlear implantation from 2014 to 2022 at a single institution. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients required reimplantation within the 8-year study period. During this time frame, a total of 202 cochlear implants were implanted in 171 pediatric patients, resulting in a reimplantation rate of 5.9 %. Our reimplantation patient population were majority white (61.9 %), female (52.4 %), and insured by Medicaid (61.9 %). The average age at implantation was 54.8 months ±47.5 months and the average age at reimplantation was 100.1 months ±55.9 months. The average time between initial implantation and reimplantation was 46.2 months ±30.2 months. The most common sign of failure was abnormal impedances (47.6 %). Reimplantation was required more often for hard failure (76.2 %), which occurred secondary to trauma in 56.3 % of patients, and occurred more frequently in those ages 5-7. Operative findings were unremarkable in 81 % of patients. Those with audiologic data were noted to have stable or improved thresholds after their revision surgery. Three of the 21 patients discontinued use of their processor on the revised ear. Of these, two had known trauma associated with implant failure that was not immediately addressed. CONCLUSION: We noted increased rates of hard failure, most commonly secondary to trauma. We noted that majority of those who discontinued use of their implant after revision surgery had associated traumatic injuries that ultimately delayed their presentation and surgery.

Predictive Factors for Subjective Vertigo Following Cochlear Implantation: A Regional Multicenter Cohort Study of 395 Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Cochlear implantation (CI) is generally accepted as having a low rate of postoperative complications, but between 9.3% and 13% of cases experience vertigo postoperatively. This study aimed to examine patient, surgical, and device factors contributing toward the risk of postoperative vertigo. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective review was conducted of adult patients who underwent cochlear implant in a regional area of New South Wales from 2007 to 2018. A total of 395 cochlear implant cases were included in the final study. RESULTS: The overall incidence of vertigo at 3 months of follow-up was 7.1% (n = 28/395). No difference was identified in this study between rates of postoperative vertigo between device factors, including implant make (Cochlear vs. Med-El), electrode shape (perimodiolar vs. straight), and electrode model. No significant difference was found also for surgical factors such as the number of electrode rings inserted, side of implantation, or surgical approach of tympanic ramp (round window insertion vs. cochleostomy).A higher percentage of patients with preoperative vertigo experienced vertigo postoperatively (18.4%, n = 7/38), compared with the population without preoperative vertigo (6.0%, n = 21/352) ( p = 0.005). Patients with previous mastoid surgery also reported a higher rate of postoperative vertigo (20%, n = 9/45) compared with those who had not had mastoid surgery (5.43%, n = 19/350) ( p = 0.006). The mean age of patients experiencing postoperative vertigo was higher than the population without postoperative symptoms (67 vs. 63). CONCLUSION: This study of a large multicenter population outlines that patient factors are more critical than surgical or device factors when considering risk factors for vertigo post-cochlear implant.

Effective cochlear implantation for idiopathic hypertrophic pachymeningitis with bilateral profound hearing loss: A case report.

RATIONALE: Hypertrophic pachymeningitis (HP) is a local or diffuse fibrous thickness of the dura mater of the brain or spinal cord, caused by infection or connective tissue disease. Headache is the most common clinical symptom, followed by various cranial nerve disorders such as visual impairment, diplopia, and hearing loss. HP can be classified into secondary and idiopathic. Here, we report a case of bilateral progressive profound sensorineural hearing loss diagnosed in a patient with idiopathic HP, where a cochlear implant was effectively used. PATIENT CONCERNS: The patient was a 77-year-old woman. Hearing loss gradually progressed bilaterally, and magnetic resonance imaging showed a space-occupying lesion with a continuous contrast enhancement in the bilateral internal auditory canals, and diffused dural thickening from the middle to the posterior cranial fossa. DIAGNOSES: A trans-labyrinthine biopsy was conducted, and a definite diagnosis of idiopathic HP was made. Thickening of the dura mater in the bilateral internal auditory canals was thought to cause profound hearing loss. INTERVENTIONS AND OUTCOMES: A cochlear implant was implemented 4 months after biopsy, and a favorable hearing response was obtained postoperatively. LESSONS: This is the first report of a cochlear implant in a patient with idiopathic HP. Cochlear implantation was considered a good treatment for profound hearing loss due to idiopathic HP, which provides a reference for patients to receive timely and correct treatment.